New research
presented this week at the Royal Economic Society Conference from our
Department of Social & Policy Science questions the commonly held
belief that more education is 'good for you' and results in higher
wages and better life outcomes.
Previous work on
this question generally suggested that the effect of 1972 school
leaving age reform was positive; more recent estimates have
challenged the magnitude of such effects suggesting a downward
revision from 15% to 5%. But none of these studies examined the early
parts of the life-cycle, concentrating only on the later working
years.
But when comparing
the lifetime wage trajectories of individuals who were born shortly
before and shortly after the reform, the authors find that those with
additional education suffered significantly lower wages in the first
part of their working lives. On average, men with additional
education suffered lower earnings until they were aged mid-30s. Post
mid-30s wage differentials were non-significant.
Importantly, the
authors argue that this negative effect is induced by the loss of
early labour market experience and that previous studies did not
adequately deal with this phenomenon. When correcting for this, the
authors identify that the effect of education remains positive and
significant.
Dr Buscha added:
"Our research shows that it is important that when designing
school leaving age reforms, such as the recent Raising of the
Participation Age, that children are not only made to learn useful
skills during this additional education but that practical
arrangements are made to smooth integration into the labour market
such that the negative effects of lost work experience are kept to a
minimum."
Read more at: http://phys.org/news/2016-03-wont-necessarily-richer-reveals.html#jCp
Read more at: http://phys.org/news/2016-03-wont-necessarily-richer-reveals.html#jCp
No comments:
Post a Comment